lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bf7e1d2-e2d4-c56f-cd04-0045dc4c7e2f@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:57:36 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] xfs: Replace one-element arrays with flexible-array
 members

Hi Darrick,

Please, see my comments below...

On 3/9/21 11:42, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:05:58AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
>> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
>> should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
>> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
>>
>> Refactor the code according to the use of flexible-array members in
>> multiple structures, instead of one-element arrays. Also, make use of
>> the new struct_size() helper to properly calculate the size of multiple
>> structures that contain flexible-array members.
>>
>> Below are the results of running xfstests for groups shutdown and log
>> with the following configuration in local.config:
>>
>> export TEST_DEV=/dev/sda3
>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
>> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda4
>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
>>
>> The size for both partitions /dev/sda3 and /dev/sda4 is 25GB.
>>
>> These are the results of running ./check -g shutdown and ./check -g
>> log, respectively, on 5.11.0-next-20210301 kernel _without_ this patch
>> applied:
>>
>> gustavo@...fy:~/git/xfstests$ time sudo ./check -g shutdown 2>&1 | tee xfs-shutdown-no-patch.out
>> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 beefy 5.11.0-next-20210301 #4 SMP Mon Mar 1 05:42:06 CST 2021
>> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda4
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch
>>
>> generic/042 2s ...  2s
>> generic/043 13s ...  13s
>> generic/044 14s ...  14s
>> generic/045 18s ...  18s
>> generic/046 14s ...  14s
>> generic/047 20s ...  22s
>> generic/048 51s ...  50s
>> generic/049 9s ...  8s
>> generic/050 2s ...  1s
>> generic/051 76s ...  75s
>> generic/052 1s ...  2s
>> generic/054 31s ...  30s
>> generic/055 16s ...  21s
>> generic/388 89s ...  75s
>> generic/392 5s ...  5s
>> generic/417 11s ...  11s
>> generic/461 21s ...  22s
>> generic/468 3s ...  3s
>> generic/474 1s ...  1s
>> generic/475 86s ...  93s
>> generic/505 2s ...  2s
>> generic/506 2s ...  2s
>> generic/507     [not run] file system doesn't support chattr +AsSu
>> generic/508 1s ...  1s
>> generic/530 10s ...  10s
>> generic/536 3s ...  2s
>> generic/599 1s ...  1s
>> generic/622 23s ...  24s
>> xfs/051 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/079 15s ...  14s
>> xfs/121 6s ...  16s
>> xfs/181 12s ...  15s
>> xfs/212 1s ...  3s
>> Ran: generic/042 generic/043 generic/044 generic/045 generic/046 generic/047 generic/048 generic/049 generic/050 generic/051 generic/052 generic/054 generic/055 generic/388 generic/392 generic/417 generic/461 generic/468 generic/474 generic/475 generic/505 generic/506 generic/507 generic/508 generic/530 generic/536 generic/599 generic/622 xfs/051 xfs/079 xfs/121 xfs/181 xfs/212
>> Not run: generic/507
>> Passed all 33 tests
>>
>> gustavo@...fy:~/git/xfstests$ time sudo ./check -g log 2>&1 | tee xfs-log-no-patch.out
>> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 beefy 5.11.0-next-20210301 #4 SMP Mon Mar 1 05:42:06 CST 2021
>> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda4
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch
>>
>> generic/034 1s ...  1s
>> generic/039 1s ...  1s
>> generic/040 5s ...  5s
>> generic/041 7s ...  7s
>> generic/043 13s ...  13s
>> generic/044 14s ...  14s
>> generic/045 18s ...  18s
>> generic/046 14s ...  14s
>> generic/051 76s ...  76s
>> generic/052 1s ...  2s
>> generic/054 30s ...  48s
>> generic/055 23s ...  15s
>> generic/056 1s ...  1s
>> generic/057 1s ...  1s
>> generic/059 2s ...  2s
>> generic/065 1s ...  1s
>> generic/066 1s ...  2s
>> generic/073 1s ...  1s
>> generic/090 1s ...  1s
>> generic/101 1s ...  1s
>> generic/104 1s ...  1s
>> generic/106 1s ...  1s
>> generic/107 1s ...  1s
>> generic/177 1s ...  1s
>> generic/311 67s ...  67s
>> generic/321 2s ...  2s
>> generic/322 1s ...  2s
>> generic/325 1s ...  1s
>> generic/335 1s ...  1s
>> generic/336 2s ...  1s
>> generic/341 1s ...  1s
>> generic/342 1s ...  1s
>> generic/343 1s ...  1s
>> generic/376 1s ...  1s
>> generic/388 75s ...  97s
>> generic/417 15s ...  12s
>> generic/455     [not run] This test requires a valid $LOGWRITES_DEV
>> generic/457     [not run] This test requires a valid $LOGWRITES_DEV
>> generic/475 88s ...  89s
>> generic/479 2s ...  2s
>> generic/480 1s ...  1s
>> generic/481 1s ...  1s
>> generic/483 7s ...  6s
>> generic/489 1s ...  1s
>> generic/498 1s ...  1s
>> generic/501 61s ...  63s
>> generic/502 1s ...  1s
>> generic/509 1s ...  1s
>> generic/510 1s ...  1s
>> generic/512 1s ...  1s
>> generic/520 16s ...  17s
>> generic/526 2s ...  1s
>> generic/527 0s ...  1s
>> generic/534 0s ...  1s
>> generic/535 2s ...  1s
>> generic/546 3s ...  3s
>> generic/547 2s ...  2s
>> generic/552 1s ...  1s
>> generic/557 1s ...  2s
>> generic/588 2s ...  1s
>> shared/002 9s ...  9s
>> xfs/011 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/029 1s ...  1s
>> xfs/051 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/057 23s ...  23s
>> xfs/079 14s ...  14s
>> xfs/095 1s ...  1s
>> xfs/119 3s ...  3s
>> xfs/121 6s ...  6s
>> xfs/141 14s ...  26s
>> xfs/181 14s ...  14s
>> xfs/216 3s ...  2s
>> xfs/217 2s ...  2s
>> xfs/439 [not run] test requires XFS bug_on_assert to be off, turn it off to run the test
>> Ran: generic/034 generic/039 generic/040 generic/041 generic/043 generic/044 generic/045 generic/046 generic/051 generic/052 generic/054 generic/055 generic/056 generic/057 generic/059 generic/065 generic/066 generic/073 generic/090 generic/101 generic/104 generic/106 generic/107 generic/177 generic/311 generic/321 generic/322 generic/325 generic/335 generic/336 generic/341 generic/342 generic/343 generic/376 generic/388 generic/417 generic/455 generic/457 generic/475 generic/479 generic/480 generic/481 generic/483 generic/489 generic/498 generic/501 generic/502 generic/509 generic/510 generic/512 generic/520 generic/526 generic/527 generic/534 generic/535 generic/546 generic/547 generic/552 generic/557 generic/588 shared/002 xfs/011 xfs/029 xfs/051 xfs/057 xfs/079 xfs/095 xfs/119 xfs/121 xfs/141 xfs/181 xfs/216 xfs/217 xfs/439
>> Not run: generic/455 generic/457 xfs/439
>> Passed all 74 tests
>>
>> These are the results of running ./check -g shutdown and ./check -g
>> log, respectively, on 5.11.0-xfstests-patched-next-20210301+ kernel
>> _with_ this patch applied on top:
>>
>> gustavo@...fy:~/git/xfstests$ time sudo ./check -g shutdown 2>&1 | tee xfs-shutdown-patched.out
>> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 beefy 5.11.0-xfstests-patched-next-20210301+ #10 SMP Mon Mar 1 17:36:20 CST 2021
>> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda4
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch
>>
>> generic/042 2s ...  3s
>> generic/043 13s ...  12s
>> generic/044 14s ...  15s
>> generic/045 18s ...  18s
>> generic/046 14s ...  15s
>> generic/047 21s ...  21s
>> generic/048 51s ...  51s
>> generic/049 9s ...  8s
>> generic/050 1s ...  2s
>> generic/051 76s ...  77s
>> generic/052 6s ...  2s
>> generic/054 35s ...  48s
>> generic/055 16s ...  17s
>> generic/388 77s ...  73s
>> generic/392 7s ...  5s
>> generic/417 13s ...  11s
>> generic/461 22s ...  21s
>> generic/468 2s ...  3s
>> generic/474 2s ...  1s
>> generic/475 90s ...  96s
>> generic/505 3s ...  3s
>> generic/506 1s ...  2s
>> generic/507     [not run] file system doesn't support chattr +AsSu
>> generic/508 2s ...  10s
>> generic/530 9s ...  13s
>> generic/536 2s ...  1s
>> generic/599 1s ...  1s
>> generic/622 24s ...  25s
>> xfs/051 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/079 14s ...  13s
>> xfs/121 6s ...  8s
>> xfs/181 11s ...  14s
>> xfs/212 2s ...  1s
>> Ran: generic/042 generic/043 generic/044 generic/045 generic/046 generic/047 generic/048 generic/049 generic/050 generic/051 generic/052 generic/054 generic/055 generic/388 generic/392 generic/417 generic/461 generic/468 generic/474 generic/475 generic/505 generic/506 generic/507 generic/508 generic/530 generic/536 generic/599 generic/622 xfs/051 xfs/079 xfs/121 xfs/181 xfs/212
>> Not run: generic/507
>> Passed all 33 tests
>>
>> gustavo@...fy:~/git/xfstests$ time sudo ./check -g log 2>&1 | tee xfs-log-patched.out
>> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 beefy 5.11.0-xfstests-patched-next-20210301+ #10 SMP Mon Mar 1 17:36:20 CST 2021
>> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda4
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /mnt/scratch
>>
>> generic/034 1s ...  1s
>> generic/039 1s ...  1s
>> generic/040 5s ...  5s
>> generic/041 7s ...  7s
>> generic/043 12s ...  13s
>> generic/044 15s ...  15s
>> generic/045 18s ...  18s
>> generic/046 15s ...  14s
>> generic/051 77s ...  76s
>> generic/052 2s ...  1s
>> generic/054 48s ...  29s
>> generic/055 17s ...  16s
>> generic/056 1s ...  1s
>> generic/057 1s ...  1s
>> generic/059 2s ...  2s
>> generic/065 1s ...  1s
>> generic/066 1s ...  1s
>> generic/073 1s ...  1s
>> generic/090 1s ...  1s
>> generic/101 1s ...  1s
>> generic/104 1s ...  1s
>> generic/106 1s ...  1s
>> generic/107 1s ...  1s
>> generic/177 1s ...  1s
>> generic/311 68s ...  68s
>> generic/321 2s ...  2s
>> generic/322 1s ...  1s
>> generic/325 2s ...  1s
>> generic/335 1s ...  1s
>> generic/336 1s ...  1s
>> generic/341 1s ...  1s
>> generic/342 1s ...  1s
>> generic/343 1s ...  1s
>> generic/376 1s ...  1s
>> generic/388 73s ...  83s
>> generic/417 11s ...  11s
>> generic/455     [not run] This test requires a valid $LOGWRITES_DEV
>> generic/457     [not run] This test requires a valid $LOGWRITES_DEV
>> generic/475 96s ...  83s
>> generic/479      2s
>> generic/480 2s ...  1s
>> generic/481 0s ...  1s
>> generic/483 7s ...  7s
>> generic/489 1s ...  1s
>> generic/498 1s ...  1s
>> generic/501 63s ...  61s
>> generic/502 1s ...  1s
>> generic/509 1s ...  1s
>> generic/510 1s ...  1s
>> generic/512 1s ...  1s
>> generic/520 16s ...  16s
>> generic/526 1s ...  1s
>> generic/527 1s ...  1s
>> generic/534 1s ...  1s
>> generic/535 1s ...  1s
>> generic/546 4s ...  4s
>> generic/547 2s ...  2s
>> generic/552 1s ...  1s
>> generic/557 1s ...  1s
>> generic/588 2s ...  1s
>> shared/002 8s ...  9s
>> xfs/011 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/029 1s ...  1s
>> xfs/051 18s ...  18s
>> xfs/057 23s ...  24s
>> xfs/079 13s ...  14s
>> xfs/095 2s ...  1s
>> xfs/119 3s ...  3s
>> xfs/121 8s ...  6s
>> xfs/141 18s ...  12s
>> xfs/181 14s ...  12s
>> xfs/216 3s ...  2s
>> xfs/217 2s ...  2s
>> xfs/439 [not run] test requires XFS bug_on_assert to be off, turn it off to run the test
>> Ran: generic/034 generic/039 generic/040 generic/041 generic/043 generic/044 generic/045 generic/046 generic/051 generic/052 generic/054 generic/055 generic/056 generic/057 generic/059 generic/065 generic/066 generic/073 generic/090 generic/101 generic/104 generic/106 generic/107 generic/177 generic/311 generic/321 generic/322 generic/325 generic/335 generic/336 generic/341 generic/342 generic/343 generic/376 generic/388 generic/417 generic/455 generic/457 generic/475 generic/479 generic/480 generic/481 generic/483 generic/489 generic/498 generic/501 generic/502 generic/509 generic/510 generic/512 generic/520 generic/526 generic/527 generic/534 generic/535 generic/546 generic/547 generic/552 generic/557 generic/588 shared/002 xfs/011 xfs/029 xfs/051 xfs/057 xfs/079 xfs/095 xfs/119 xfs/121 xfs/141 xfs/181 xfs/216 xfs/217 xfs/439
>> Not run: generic/455 generic/457 xfs/439
>> Passed all 74 tests
>>
>> Notice that the test results before and after this patch is applied are
>> identical and successful. Other tests might need to be run in order to
>> verify everything is working as expected. For such tests, the intervention
>> of the maintainers might be needed.
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
>> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
>> Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/603e3177.WsvTXRpcLn5wdYW6%25lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h | 12 +++++------
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c      | 39 +++++++++++++++-------------------
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h            |  8 +++----
>>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
>> index 8bd00da6d2a4..9934a465b441 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
>> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format {
>>  	uint16_t		efi_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efi_nextents;	/* # extents to free */
>>  	uint64_t		efi_id;		/* efi identifier */
>> -	xfs_extent_t		efi_extents[1];	/* array of extents to free */
>> +	xfs_extent_t		efi_extents[];	/* array of extents to free */
>>  } xfs_efi_log_format_t;
>>  
>>  typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format_32 {
>> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format_32 {
>>  	uint16_t		efi_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efi_nextents;	/* # extents to free */
>>  	uint64_t		efi_id;		/* efi identifier */
>> -	xfs_extent_32_t		efi_extents[1];	/* array of extents to free */
>> +	xfs_extent_32_t		efi_extents[];	/* array of extents to free */
>>  } __attribute__((packed)) xfs_efi_log_format_32_t;
>>  
>>  typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format_64 {
>> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format_64 {
>>  	uint16_t		efi_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efi_nextents;	/* # extents to free */
>>  	uint64_t		efi_id;		/* efi identifier */
>> -	xfs_extent_64_t		efi_extents[1];	/* array of extents to free */
>> +	xfs_extent_64_t		efi_extents[];	/* array of extents to free */
>>  } xfs_efi_log_format_64_t;
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format {
>>  	uint16_t		efd_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efd_nextents;	/* # of extents freed */
>>  	uint64_t		efd_efi_id;	/* id of corresponding efi */
>> -	xfs_extent_t		efd_extents[1];	/* array of extents freed */
>> +	xfs_extent_t		efd_extents[];	/* array of extents freed */
>>  } xfs_efd_log_format_t;
>>  
>>  typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_32 {
>> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_32 {
>>  	uint16_t		efd_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efd_nextents;	/* # of extents freed */
>>  	uint64_t		efd_efi_id;	/* id of corresponding efi */
>> -	xfs_extent_32_t		efd_extents[1];	/* array of extents freed */
>> +	xfs_extent_32_t		efd_extents[];	/* array of extents freed */
>>  } __attribute__((packed)) xfs_efd_log_format_32_t;
>>  
>>  typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_64 {
>> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_64 {
>>  	uint16_t		efd_size;	/* size of this item */
>>  	uint32_t		efd_nextents;	/* # of extents freed */
>>  	uint64_t		efd_efi_id;	/* id of corresponding efi */
>> -	xfs_extent_64_t		efd_extents[1];	/* array of extents freed */
>> +	xfs_extent_64_t		efd_extents[];	/* array of extents freed */
>>  } xfs_efd_log_format_64_t;
>>  
>>  /*
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
>> index 93223ebb3372..5ed3ea93071c 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
>> @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static inline int
>>  xfs_efi_item_sizeof(
>>  	struct xfs_efi_log_item *efip)
>>  {
>> -	return sizeof(struct xfs_efi_log_format) +
>> -	       (efip->efi_format.efi_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t);
>> +	return struct_size(&efip->efi_format, efi_extents,
>> +			   efip->efi_format.efi_nextents);
>>  }
>>  
>>  STATIC void
>> @@ -153,17 +153,14 @@ xfs_efi_init(
>>  
>>  {
>>  	struct xfs_efi_log_item	*efip;
>> -	uint			size;
>>  
>>  	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
>> -	if (nextents > XFS_EFI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
>> -		size = (uint)(sizeof(struct xfs_efi_log_item) +
>> -			((nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t)));
>> -		efip = kmem_zalloc(size, 0);
>> -	} else {
>> +	if (nextents > XFS_EFI_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS)
>> +		efip = kmem_zalloc(struct_size(efip, efi_format.efi_extents,
>> +					       nextents), 0);
>> +	else
>>  		efip = kmem_cache_zalloc(xfs_efi_zone,
>>  					 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	xfs_log_item_init(mp, &efip->efi_item, XFS_LI_EFI, &xfs_efi_item_ops);
>>  	efip->efi_format.efi_nextents = nextents;
>> @@ -186,12 +183,12 @@ xfs_efi_copy_format(xfs_log_iovec_t *buf, xfs_efi_log_format_t *dst_efi_fmt)
>>  {
>>  	xfs_efi_log_format_t *src_efi_fmt = buf->i_addr;
>>  	uint i;
>> -	uint len = sizeof(xfs_efi_log_format_t) + 
>> -		(src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t);  
>> +	size_t len = struct_size(src_efi_fmt, efi_extents,
>> +				 src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents);
>>  	uint len32 = sizeof(xfs_efi_log_format_32_t) + 
>> -		(src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_32_t);  
>> +		src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents * sizeof(xfs_extent_32_t);
> 
> Shouldn't these be converted to struct_size() too?
> 
> It seems to work all right for casted NULL pointers, and then we get all
> the typechecking and multiplication overflow checking, e.g.:
> 
> 	size_t len64 = struct_size((struct xfs_efi_log_format_32 *)NULL,
> 				efi_extents src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents);

Yeah; in that case, what do you think about casting 0, instead of NULL:

       uint len32 = struct_size((xfs_efi_log_format_32_t *)0, efi_extents,
                                src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents);
       uint len64 = struct_size((xfs_efi_log_format_64_t *)0, efi_extents,
                                src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents);

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> 
> --D
> 
>>  	uint len64 = sizeof(xfs_efi_log_format_64_t) + 
>> -		(src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_64_t);  
>> +		src_efi_fmt->efi_nextents * sizeof(xfs_extent_64_t);
>>  
>>  	if (buf->i_len == len) {
>>  		memcpy((char *)dst_efi_fmt, (char*)src_efi_fmt, len);
>> @@ -254,7 +251,7 @@ xfs_efd_item_sizeof(
>>  	struct xfs_efd_log_item *efdp)
>>  {
>>  	return sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_t) +
>> -	       (efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t);
>> +	       efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents * sizeof(xfs_extent_t);
>>  }
>>  
>>  STATIC void
>> @@ -328,14 +325,12 @@ xfs_trans_get_efd(
>>  
>>  	ASSERT(nextents > 0);
>>  
>> -	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS) {
>> -		efdp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_item) +
>> -				(nextents - 1) * sizeof(struct xfs_extent),
>> -				0);
>> -	} else {
>> +	if (nextents > XFS_EFD_MAX_FAST_EXTENTS)
>> +		efdp = kmem_zalloc(struct_size(efip, efi_format.efi_extents,
>> +					nextents), 0);
>> +	else
>>  		efdp = kmem_cache_zalloc(xfs_efd_zone,
>>  					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	xfs_log_item_init(tp->t_mountp, &efdp->efd_item, XFS_LI_EFD,
>>  			  &xfs_efd_item_ops);
>> @@ -747,9 +742,9 @@ xlog_recover_efd_commit_pass2(
>>  
>>  	efd_formatp = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
>>  	ASSERT((item->ri_buf[0].i_len == (sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_32_t) +
>> -		((efd_formatp->efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_32_t)))) ||
>> +		(efd_formatp->efd_nextents * sizeof(xfs_extent_32_t)))) ||
>>  	       (item->ri_buf[0].i_len == (sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_64_t) +
>> -		((efd_formatp->efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_64_t)))));
>> +		(efd_formatp->efd_nextents * sizeof(xfs_extent_64_t)))));
>>  
>>  	xlog_recover_release_intent(log, XFS_LI_EFI, efd_formatp->efd_efi_id);
>>  	return 0;
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
>> index 0aa87c210104..f58e0510385a 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
>> @@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ xfs_check_ondisk_structs(void)
>>  	/* log structures */
>>  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_buf_log_format,	88);
>>  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dq_logformat,		24);
>> -	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_32,	28);
>> -	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_64,	32);
>> -	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_32,	28);
>> -	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_64,	32);
>> +	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_32,	16);
>> +	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_64,	16);
>> +	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_32,	16);
>> +	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_64,	16);
>>  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_extent_32,		12);
>>  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_extent_64,		16);
>>  	XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_log_dinode,		176);
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ