[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210309213229.GT2696@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:32:29 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 0/6] softirq: Add RT specific softirq accounting
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> RT runs softirq processing always in thread context and it requires that
> both the softirq execution and the BH disabled sections are preemptible.
>
> This is achieved by serialization through per CPU local locks and
> substituting a few parts of the existing softirq processing code with
> helper functions.
>
> The series applies on top of
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git tasklet-2021-03-09
>
> and is completely available from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git softirq
>
> Changes to V2 which can be found here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204170151.960336698@linutronix.de
>
> - Split the tasklet changes out (seperate submission)
>
> - Rebase it on the tasklet series (no further changes)
Passes modest rcutorture testing, and I do like the "NOHZ tick-stop
error" maybe going away! That error is rare enough that it will take
some time to be reasonably certain. In the meantime:
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists