lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:26:05 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Avoid pointless deferred probe attempts

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:11 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> There's no point in adding a device to the deferred probe list if we
> know for sure that it doesn't have a matching driver. So, check if a
> device can match with a driver before adding it to the deferred probe
> list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>

Rafael/Greg,

Any concerns with this specific patch? Do you see any bugs? I'm asking
because some of the other improvements I'm working on depend on this
flag. So I want to make sure this can land before I take my work in
progress too far.

-Saravana

> ---
>  drivers/base/dd.c      | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/device.h | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 9179825ff646..f18963f42e21 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(deferred_probe_work, deferred_probe_work_func);
>
>  void driver_deferred_probe_add(struct device *dev)
>  {
> +       if (!dev->can_match)
> +               return;
> +
>         mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
>         if (list_empty(&dev->p->deferred_probe)) {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Added to deferred list\n");
> @@ -726,6 +729,7 @@ static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
>         if (!device_is_registered(dev))
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> +       dev->can_match = true;
>         pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
>                  drv->bus->name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv->name);
>
> @@ -829,6 +833,7 @@ static int __device_attach_driver(struct device_driver *drv, void *_data)
>                 return 0;
>         } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Device match requests probe deferral\n");
> +               dev->can_match = true;
>                 driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
>         } else if (ret < 0) {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Bus failed to match device: %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1064,6 +1069,7 @@ static int __driver_attach(struct device *dev, void *data)
>                 return 0;
>         } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Device match requests probe deferral\n");
> +               dev->can_match = true;
>                 driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
>         } else if (ret < 0) {
>                 dev_dbg(dev, "Bus failed to match device: %d\n", ret);
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index ba660731bd25..569932d282c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -439,6 +439,9 @@ struct dev_links_info {
>   * @state_synced: The hardware state of this device has been synced to match
>   *               the software state of this device by calling the driver/bus
>   *               sync_state() callback.
> + * @can_match: The device has matched with a driver at least once or it is in
> + *             a bus (like AMBA) which can't check for matching drivers until
> + *             other devices probe successfully.
>   * @dma_coherent: this particular device is dma coherent, even if the
>   *             architecture supports non-coherent devices.
>   * @dma_ops_bypass: If set to %true then the dma_ops are bypassed for the
> @@ -545,6 +548,7 @@ struct device {
>         bool                    offline:1;
>         bool                    of_node_reused:1;
>         bool                    state_synced:1;
> +       bool                    can_match:1;
>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE) || \
>      defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU) || \
>      defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU_ALL)
> --
> 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ