linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm/vmscan: add helper for querying ability to age anonymous pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:14:45 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm/vmscan: add helper for querying ability to age
 anonymous pages

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:01 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Anonymous pages are kept on their own LRU(s).  These lists could
> theoretically always be scanned and maintained.  But, without swap,
> there is currently nothing the kernel can *do* with the results of a
> scanned, sorted LRU for anonymous pages.
>
> A check for '!total_swap_pages' currently serves as a valid check as
> to whether anonymous LRUs should be maintained.  However, another
> method will be added shortly: page demotion.
>
> Abstract out the 'total_swap_pages' checks into a helper, give it a
> logically significant name, and check for the possibility of page
> demotion.

Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> ---
>
>  b/mm/vmscan.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-anon-can-be-aged mm/vmscan.c
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-anon-can-be-aged    2021-03-04 15:35:58.935806422 -0800
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c       2021-03-04 15:35:58.942806422 -0800
> @@ -2517,6 +2517,26 @@ out:
>         }
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Anonymous LRU management is a waste if there is
> + * ultimately no way to reclaim the memory.
> + */
> +bool anon_should_be_aged(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> +       struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
> +
> +       /* Aging the anon LRU is valuable if swap is present: */
> +       if (total_swap_pages > 0)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       /* Also valuable if anon pages can be demoted: */
> +       if (next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id) >= 0)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       /* No way to reclaim anon pages.  Should not age anon LRUs: */
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
>         unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> @@ -2626,7 +2646,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec
>          * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
>          * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
>          */
> -       if (total_swap_pages && inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
> +       if (anon_should_be_aged(lruvec) &&
> +           inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
>                 shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec,
>                                    sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
>  }
> @@ -3455,10 +3476,11 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglis
>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>         struct lruvec *lruvec;
>
> -       if (!total_swap_pages)
> +       lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat);
> +
> +       if (!anon_should_be_aged(lruvec))
>                 return;
>
> -       lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat);
>         if (!inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
>                 return;
>
> _
>