[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cc37aec-bd27-235a-7c37-e8f1113c6a3c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:02:35 +0200
From: Dvora Fuxbrumer <dvorax.fuxbrumer@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>, kjlu@....edu
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Fix error handling in
e1000_set_d0_lplu_state_82571
On 28/02/2021 11:44, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> There is one e1e_wphy() call in e1000_set_d0_lplu_state_82571
> that we have caught its return value but lack further handling.
> Check and terminate the execution flow just like other e1e_wphy()
> in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> index 88faf05e23ba..0b1e890dd583 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> @@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ static s32 e1000_set_d0_lplu_state_82571(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool active)
> } else {
> data &= ~IGP02E1000_PM_D0_LPLU;
> ret_val = e1e_wphy(hw, IGP02E1000_PHY_POWER_MGMT, data);
> + if (ret_val)
> + return ret_val;
> /* LPLU and SmartSpeed are mutually exclusive. LPLU is used
> * during Dx states where the power conservation is most
> * important. During driver activity we should enable
>
Tested-by: Dvora Fuxbrumer <dvorax.fuxbrumer@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists