[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEcn6bGYxdgrp0Ik@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:46:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: "Xu, Like" <like.xu@...el.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner
(x86/pti/timer/core/smp/irq/perf/efi/locking/ras/objtool)
(x86@...nel.org)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fix guest_get_msrs static call if there is no
PMU
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:40:44PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Given the one user in atomic_switch_perf_msrs() that should work because
> > it doesn't seem to care about nr_msrs when !msrs.
>
> Uh, that commit quite cleary says:
D0h! I got static_call_cond() and __static_call_return0 mixed up.
Anyway, let me see if I can make something work here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists