[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210309080020.23014-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 00:00:20 -0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: hubcap@...ibond.com, martin@...ibond.com
Cc: devel@...ts.orangefs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: orangefs: fix error return code of orangefs_revalidate_lookup()
When op_alloc() returns NULL to new_op, no error return code of
orangefs_revalidate_lookup() is assigned.
To fix this bug, ret is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case.
Fixes: 8bb8aefd5afb ("OrangeFS: Change almost all instances of the string PVFS2 to OrangeFS.")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
fs/orangefs/dcache.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c
index fe484cf93e5c..8bbe9486e3a6 100644
--- a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c
@@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ static int orangefs_revalidate_lookup(struct dentry *dentry)
gossip_debug(GOSSIP_DCACHE_DEBUG, "%s: attempting lookup.\n", __func__);
new_op = op_alloc(ORANGEFS_VFS_OP_LOOKUP);
- if (!new_op)
+ if (!new_op) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_parent;
+ }
new_op->upcall.req.lookup.sym_follow = ORANGEFS_LOOKUP_LINK_NO_FOLLOW;
new_op->upcall.req.lookup.parent_refn = parent->refn;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists