linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 14/14] vfio: Cleanup use of bare unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210309083115.GA55734@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:31:15 +0000
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, cohuck@...hat.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peterx@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/14] vfio: Cleanup use of bare unsigned

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:07:45PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Indeed, checkpatch has been warning about this too

And checkaptch as so often these days is completely full of shit.
There is ansolutely not objective reason against using bare unsigned
except for a weird anal preference of a checkpatch author.