[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a947c73-16e9-7ca7-c185-d4c951938505@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:34:43 +0800
From: "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@...wei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>,
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: Skip the cache flush when coalescing
tables into a block
On 2021/3/9 0:34, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:10:44PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
>> After dirty-logging is stopped for a VM configured with huge mappings,
>> KVM will recover the table mappings back to block mappings. As we only
>> replace the existing page tables with a block entry and the cacheability
>> has not been changed, the cache maintenance opreations can be skipped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 8e8549ea1d70..37b427dcbc4f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>> {
>> int ret = 0;
>> bool write_fault, writable, force_pte = false;
>> - bool exec_fault;
>> + bool exec_fault, adjust_hugepage;
>> bool device = false;
>> unsigned long mmu_seq;
>> struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> @@ -872,12 +872,18 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>> mark_page_dirty(kvm, gfn);
>> }
>>
>> - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device)
>> + /*
>> + * There is no necessity to perform cache maintenance operations if we
>> + * will only replace the existing table mappings with a block mapping.
>> + */
>> + adjust_hugepage = fault_granule < vma_pagesize ? true : false;
> nit: you don't need the '? true : false' part
>
> That said, your previous patch checks for 'fault_granule > vma_pagesize',
> so I'm not sure the local variable helps all that much here because it
> obscures the size checks in my opinion. It would be more straight-forward
> if we could structure the logic as:
>
>
> if (fault_granule < vma_pagesize) {
>
> } else if (fault_granule > vma_page_size) {
>
> } else {
>
> }
>
> With some comments describing what we can infer about the memcache and cache
> maintenance requirements for each case.
Thanks for your suggestion here, Will.
But I have resent another newer series [1] (KVM: arm64: Improve
efficiency of stage2 page table)
recently, which has the same theme but different solutions that I think
are better.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208112250.163568-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/
Could you please comment on that series ? I think it can be found in
your inbox :).
Thanks,
Yanan
>
> Will
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists