lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:29:01 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        "Paul J. Murphy" <paul.j.murphy@...el.com>,
        Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org, soc@...nel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable Intel's eASIC N5X SoCFPGA and
 Keem Bay SoC

On 08/03/2021 20:07, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 3/8/21 11:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>
>> Enable in defconfig two Intel ARM64 architectures: the eASIC N5X SoCFPGA
>> and Keem Bay SoC.  This allows compile coverage when building default
>> config.
>>
>> For the N5X (and Agilex) enable also DesignWare SPI controller in MMIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> You asked me to check if all drivers are enabled for these platforms.
>> In general the answer is yes. In particular:
>> 1. Keem Bay is does not have much in upstream, but everything described
>>     in DTS is there,
>> 2. N5X shares a lot with Agilex SoCFPGA which already (mostly) is
>>     supported.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Enable also SPI_DW_MMIO
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> index d612f633b771..9f9adcb8b0e9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
>>   CONFIG_PROFILING=y
>>   CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS=y
>>   CONFIG_ARCH_AGILEX=y
>> +CONFIG_ARCH_N5X=y
> 
> I just submitted a patch for this as well. From the looks of the 
> defconfig file, it looks like the platforms are in alphabetical order, 
> but then I see that ARCH_SUNXI is not in it's correct spot if there is a 
> rule for keeping things in alphabetical order.
> 

The rule is that order comes from savedefconfig, not alphabetical. This
way you avoid reshuffling of symbols on any future savedefconfig.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ