linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 2/6] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210309093736.67925-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  9 Mar 2021 11:37:32 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type

We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type
of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 7ec0822c0505..1b3b0acdb803 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3677,11 +3677,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_gpiod_get_index);
  */
 int gpiod_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 {
+	const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;
 	int count = -ENOENT;
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node)
+	if (is_of_node(fwnode))
 		count = of_gpio_get_count(dev, con_id);
-	else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
+	else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
 		count = acpi_gpio_count(dev, con_id);
 
 	if (count < 0)
@@ -3819,18 +3820,17 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_index(struct device *dev,
 	int ret;
 	/* Maybe we have a device name, maybe not */
 	const char *devname = dev ? dev_name(dev) : "?";
+	const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
 
-	if (dev) {
-		/* Using device tree? */
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
-			dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
-			desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
-		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
-			dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
-			desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
-		}
+	/* Using device tree? */
+	if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
+		desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
+	} else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
+		desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -3914,9 +3914,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 	struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!fwnode)
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
 	if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
 		desc = gpiod_get_from_of_node(to_of_node(fwnode),
 					      propname, index,
@@ -3932,7 +3929,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 
 		acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(&dflags, &info);
 		acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_lookup_flags(&lflags, &info);
-	}
+	} else
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	/* Currently only ACPI takes this path */
 	ret = gpiod_request(desc, label);
-- 
2.30.1