[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5191EA634E57B8A5FF0DE991F1929@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:51:01 +0000
From: "Li, Meng" <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Hao, Kexin" <Kexin.Hao@...driver.com>
Subject: RE: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated name for
regmap_config"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:43 PM
> To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> arnd@...db.de; Hao, Kexin <Kexin.Hao@...driver.com>
> Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated name for
> regmap_config"
>
> [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Li, Meng wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 5:21 PM
> > > To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@...driver.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > arnd@...db.de; Hao, Kexin <Kexin.Hao@...driver.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated
> > > name for regmap_config"
> > >
> > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
> > >
> > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Limeng,
> > > >
> > > > On 2021-02-22 03:45, Li, Meng wrote:
> > > > > Hi Marc&Lee,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there any comment on this patch?
> > > > > Could you please help to review this patch so that I can improve
> > > > > it if it still has weakness?
> > > >
> > > > If you are confident that the root issue has been fixed, no
> > > > objection from me, but I'm not in a position to test it at the
> > > > moment (the board I found the problem on is in a bit of a state).
> > >
> > > I'm not keen on flip-flopping this patch in and out of the kernel.
> > > Someone really needs to spend some time to map out the full
> > > life-cycle and propose a (possibly cross-subsystem) solution.
> > >
> > Thanks for all of your comments.
>
> Have you looked into this further at all?
>
No.
Maintainer expects better solution to solve this issue from frame level, and consider cross-subsystem.
Thanks,
Limeng
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source
> software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists