linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] selinux: measure state and policy capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQEAPB_kQFxBrJWtsL8wP9YoQkCzXnXmaD5gm9duBzYcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:42:22 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
        tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com, tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com,
        casey@...aufler-ca.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
        gmazyland@...il.com, sashal@...nel.org,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selinux: measure state and policy capabilities

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
<nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 3/5/21 11:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> This draft seems fine to me, but there is a small logistical blocker
> >>> at the moment which means I can't merge this until -rc2 is released,
> >>> which likely means this coming Monday.  The problem is that this
> >>> patch relies on code that went upstream via in the last merge window
> >>> via the IMA tree, not the SELinux tree; normally that wouldn't be a
> >>> problem as I typically rebase the selinux/next to Linus' -rc1 tag
> >>> once the merge window is closed, but in this particular case the -rc1
> >>> tag is dangerously broken for some system configurations (the tag has
> >>> since been renamed) so I'm not rebasing onto -rc1 this time around.
> >>>
> >>> Assuming that -rc2 fixes the swapfile/fs-corruption problem, early
> >>> next week I'll rebase selinux/next to -rc2 and merge this patch.
> >>> However, if the swapfile bug continues past -rc2 we can consider
> >>> merging this via the IMA tree, but I'd assume not do that if possible
> >>> due to merge conflict and testing reasons.
> >>
> >> If it helps, we rebased the SCSI tree on top of the merge for the
> >> swapfile fix which is this one, without waiting for -rc2:
> >
> > Considering that -rc2 is only two days away I'm not going to lose a
> > lot of sleep over it.
> >
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>
> I can wait until the swapfile issue is resolved (in rc2 or later) and
> you are able to merge this patch. Please take your time.

Thanks for your patience Lakshmi, I just merged this into my local
selinux/next branch and will be pushing it up to kernel.org later
tonight - thank you!

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com