[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e15b92f-753e-76cf-cf6c-c9ff6910279e@flygoat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:48:39 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Loongson64: Move loongson_system_configuration
to loongson.h
在 2021/3/8 17:49, Thomas Bogendoerfer 写道:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:55:41PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Just to understand you, you want
>>>
>>> arch/mips/include/asm/loongson/2ef
>>> arch/mips/include/asm/loongson/32
>>> arch/mips/include/asm/loongson/64
>> Yeah it looks reasonable but from my point of view doing these movement
>> brings no actual benefit :-(
> oh it does for sure. There will no more build errors for non loogson
> configs for things like
>
> #include <loongson_regs.h>
It should be loongson64_regs.h then....
>
> because it will not work for loongson either. And it will be clear,
> which of the 3 loongson.h is used. Which then gives chances for even
> more cleanups.
Ahh, got your point. Probably we should rename all these loongson.h
as they should be indepedent.
Thanks.
- Jiaxun
>
> Thomas.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists