linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210310160851.GA331077@ninjato>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:08:51 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message
> > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in
> > question, so it is redundant.  Drop it.
> >
> > No functional impact.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> If there are no concerns regarding this, I'll queue it up for 5.13 in
> the ACPI tree, thanks!

I'd prefer the I2C tree a tad to avoid conflicts. Any reason for the
ACPI tree?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)