[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUjh9znKTLZ+bST6aDUFdZzvmv2SGVy=sRQ6+D=pYM9cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:41:07 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@...kylinos.cn>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
Hi Atish,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:40 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
> Currently, we perform some memory init functions in paging init. But,
> that will be an issue for NUMA support where DT needs to be flattened
> before numa initialization and memblock_present can only be called
> after numa initialization.
>
> Move memory initialization related functions to a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
This is now commit cbd34f4bb37d62d8 in v5.12-rc1, breaking the boot on
Vexriscv:
[ 0.000000] earlycon: sbi0 at I/O port 0x0 (options '')
[ 0.000000] printk: bootconsole [sbi0] enabled
[ 0.000000] printk: debug: ignoring loglevel setting.
[ 0.000000] Initial ramdisk at: 0x(ptrval) (8388608 bytes)
[ 0.000000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address c8000008
[ 0.000000] Oops [#1]
[ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
5.11.0-orangecrab-00023-g7c4fc8e3e982 #129
[ 0.000000] epc: c04d6624 ra : c04d6524 sp : c05ddf70
[ 0.000000] gp : c0678bc0 tp : c05e5b40 t0 : c8000000
[ 0.000000] t1 : 00030000 t2 : ffffffff s0 : c05ddfc0
[ 0.000000] s1 : c8000000 a0 : 00000000 a1 : c7ffffe0
[ 0.000000] a2 : 00000005 a3 : 00000001 a4 : 0000000c
[ 0.000000] a5 : 00000000 a6 : c04fe000 a7 : 0000000c
[ 0.000000] s2 : c04fe098 s3 : 000000a0 s4 : c7ffff60
[ 0.000000] s5 : c04fe0dc s6 : 80000200 s7 : c059f19c
[ 0.000000] s8 : 81000200 s9 : c059f1b8 s10: 80000200
[ 0.000000] s11: c059f19c t3 : 405dba80 t4 : c05e6f08
[ 0.000000] t5 : 81000200 t6 : 40501000
[ 0.000000] status: 00000100 badaddr: c8000008 cause: 0000000f
[ 0.000000] random: get_random_bytes called from
print_oops_end_marker+0x38/0x7c with crng_init=0
[ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Note that I have "[PATCH v2 3/4] RISC-V: Fix L1_CACHE_BYTES for RV32"[1]
applied, to avoid another crash (7c4fc8e3e982 = v5.11 + [1] +
cherry-picked commits from the riscv-for-linus-5.12-mw0 pull request).
If I revert the L1_CACHE_BYTES change, the boot continues, but I'm back
to the old issue fixed by [1]:
[ 22.126687] Freeing initrd memory: 8192K
[ 22.321811] workingset: timestamp_bits=30 max_order=15 bucket_order=0
[ 29.001509] Block layer SCSI generic (bsg) driver version 0.4
loaded (major 253)
[ 29.021555] io scheduler mq-deadline registered
[ 29.033692] io scheduler kyber registered
[ 29.141294] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 69726573
[ 29.158523] Oops [#1]
[ 29.162232] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted
5.11.0-orangecrab-00023-g7c4fc8e3e982-dirty #132
[ 29.171970] epc: c000d3b0 ra : c000eb74 sp : c182dca0
[ 29.178786] gp : c067aee0 tp : c1830000 t0 : c18d75e0
[ 29.185935] t1 : 00030000 t2 : 00000000 s0 : c182dcb0
[ 29.193028] s1 : 00000000 a0 : c05eab14 a1 : c18d75c0
[ 29.200067] a2 : c7ffe384 a3 : 69726573 a4 : f000000b
[ 29.207095] a5 : f0000000 a6 : c7fffff8 a7 : 00000000
[ 29.214141] s2 : 01001f00 s3 : c05eb000 s4 : c067c000
[ 29.221171] s5 : c000ec0c s6 : 80000000 s7 : c05eaad4
[ 29.228200] s8 : c05eab58 s9 : c05a1000 s10: c18d75c0
[ 29.235238] s11: c05eab14 t3 : 20b9a6cc t4 : 00000001
[ 29.242277] t5 : 00000000 t6 : c188cd50
[ 29.247588] status: 00000120 badaddr: 69726573 cause: 0000000d
[ 29.274424] ---[ end trace 69dee1b9ca96f1d6 ]---
[ 29.282859] note: swapper[1] exited with preempt_count 1
[ 29.293156] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
exitcode=0x0000000b
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210111234504.3782179-4-atish.patra@wdc.com/
Will have a deeper look later...
Thanks for any suggestions!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists