[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210310171419.GA981289@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:14:19 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Tan Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@...el.com>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan Yong <jonathan.yong@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
henning.schild@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] PCI: Convert __pci_read_base() to
__pci_bus_read_base()
> +static inline
> int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type,
> + struct resource *res, unsigned int reg)
This looks weird. Normal kernel style would be:
static inline int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type,
struct resource *res, unsigned int reg)
or
static inline int
__pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type,
that being said, there seems to be no good agument to even make this
and inline function.
> + return __pci_bus_read_base(dev->bus, dev->devfn, type, res, reg, dev->mmio_always_on);
Please avoid pointless overly long lines.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists