[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210310200406.GA11868@amd>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:04:06 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Jasper St. Pierre" <jstpierre@...heye.net>,
Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessos.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 23/49] ACPI: video: Add DMI quirk for GIGABYTE
GB-BXBT-2807
Hi!
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> From: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@...heye.net>
Something is funny with the From header here. But that's not main
thing -- this patch is evil.
> Unfortunately, the backlight controller only confuses userspace, which
> sees the existence of a backlight device node and has the unrealistic
> belief that there is actually a backlight there!
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
> },
> {
> .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
> + .ident = "GIGABYTE GB-BXBT-2807",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "GIGABYTE"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "GB-BXBT-2807"),
> + },
> + },
> + {
> .ident = "Sony VPCEH3U1E",
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Sony Corporation"),
Yup, and it looks like this fixes the problem for GIGABYTE
GB-BXBT-2807 but re-introduces the problem for Sony VPCEH3U1E.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists