linux-kernel - Re: [LTP] [f2fs] 02eb84b96b: ltp.swapon03.fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YEkw0J9VEg66AgIt@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:49:20 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Huang Jianan <huangjianan@...o.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Weichao Guo <guoweichao@...o.com>, rpalethorpe@...e.de,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, lkp@...el.com,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        ltp@...ts.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [f2fs] 02eb84b96b: ltp.swapon03.fail

On 03/10, Huang Jianan wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On 2021/3/9 12:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:23:35AM +0800, Weichao Guo wrote:
> > > Hi Richard,
> > > 
> > > On 2021/3/8 19:53, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > > kern  :err   : [  187.461914] F2FS-fs (sda1): Swapfile does not align to section
> > > > > commit 02eb84b96bc1b382dd138bf60724edbefe77b025
> > > > > Author: huangjianan@...o.com <huangjianan@...o.com>
> > > > > Date:   Mon Mar 1 12:58:44 2021 +0800
> > > > >       f2fs: check if swapfile is section-alligned
> > > > >       If the swapfile isn't created by pin and fallocate, it can't be
> > > > >       guaranteed section-aligned, so it may be selected by f2fs gc. When
> > > > >       gc_pin_file_threshold is reached, the address of swapfile may change,
> > > > >       but won't be synchronized to swap_extent, so swap will write to wrong
> > > > >       address, which will cause data corruption.
> > > > >       Signed-off-by: Huang Jianan <huangjianan@...o.com>
> > > > >       Signed-off-by: Guo Weichao <guoweichao@...o.com>
> > > > >       Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > > > >       Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > > > The test uses fallocate to preallocate the swap file and writes zeros to
> > > > it. I'm not sure what pin refers to?
> > > 'pin' refers to pinned file feature in F2FS, the LBA(Logical Block Address)
> > > of a file is fixed after pinned. Without this operation before fallocate,
> > > the LBA may not align with section(F2FS GC unit), some LBA of the file may
> > > be changed by F2FS GC in some extreme cases.
> > > 
> > > For this test case, how about pin the swap file before fallocate for F2FS as
> > > following:
> > > 
> > > ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE, true);
> > No special ioctl should be needed.  f2fs_swap_activate() should pin the
> > file, just like it converts inline inodes and disables compression.
> 
> Now f2fs_swap_activate() will pin the file. The problem is that when
> f2fs_swap_activate()
> 
> is executed, the file has been created and may not be section-aligned.
> 
> So I think it would be better to consider aligning the swapfile during
> f2fs_swap_activate()?

Does it make sense to reallocate blocks like
in f2fs_swap_activate(),
	set_inode_flag(inode, FI_PIN_FILE);
	truncate_pagecache(inode, 0);
	f2fs_truncate_blocks(inode, 0, true);
	expand_inode_data();