[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca946873-3872-dbc2-3331-d388782bd17e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:50:50 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Expose phydev::dev_flags through sysfs
On 3/10/21 2:48 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:12:43 -0800 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> phydev::dev_flags contains a bitmask of configuration bits requested by
>> the consumer of a PHY device (Ethernet MAC or switch) towards the PHY
>> driver. Since these flags are often used for requesting LED or other
>> type of configuration being able to quickly audit them without
>> instrumenting the kernel is useful.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-phydev | 12 ++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-phydev b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-phydev
>> index 40ced0ea4316..ac722dd5e694 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-phydev
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-phydev
>> @@ -51,3 +51,15 @@ Description:
>> Boolean value indicating whether the PHY device is used in
>> standalone mode, without a net_device associated, by PHYLINK.
>> Attribute created only when this is the case.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/class/mdio_bus/<bus>/<device>/phy_dev_flags
>> +Date: March 2021
>> +KernelVersion: 5.13
>> +Contact: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> +Description:
>> + 32-bit hexadecimal number representing a bit mask of the
>> + configuration bits passed from the consumer of the PHY
>> + (Ethernet MAC, switch, etc.) to the PHY driver. The flags are
>> + only used internally by the kernel and their placement are
>> + not meant to be stable across kernel versions. This is intended
>> + for facilitating the debugging of PHY drivers.
>
> Why not debugfs, then?
>
Mostly for consistency with what we already have exposed, I suppose that
could be moved to debugfs.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists