linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v22 8/8] x86/vdso: Add ENDBR64 to __vdso_sgx_enter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:22:41 -0800
From:   "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 8/8] x86/vdso: Add ENDBR64 to __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave

On 3/10/2021 3:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/10/21 2:55 PM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 2:39 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:05:19PM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>>>> When CET is enabled, __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() needs an endbr64
>>>> in the beginning of the function.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> What you should do is to explain what it does and why it's needed.
>>>
>>
>> The endbr marks a branch target.  Without the "no-track" prefix, if an
>> indirect call/jmp reaches a non-endbr opcode, a control-protection fault
>> is raised.  Usually endbr's are inserted by the compiler.  For assembly,
>> these have to be put in manually.  I will add this in the commit log if
>> there is another revision.  Thanks!
> 
> This is close, but it's missing a detail or two that I think is
> important for someone like Jarkko trying to figure out what it means for
> his subsystem or driver.
> 
> I'd probably say:
> 
> ENDBR is a special new instruction for the Indirect Branch Tracking
> (IBR) component of CET.  IBT prevents attacks by ensuring that (most)
> indirect branches and function calls may only land at ENDBR
> instructions.  Branches that don't follow the rules will result in
> control flow (#CF) exceptions.
> 
> ENDBR is a noop when IBT is unsupported or disabled.  Most ENDBR
> instructions are inserted automatically by the compiler, but branch
> targets written in assembly must have ENDBR added manually, like this one.
> 

Ok, I will update.  Thanks!

--
Yu-cheng