[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEh4doXvyuRl5BDB@google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:42:46 -0800
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Dias <joaodias@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:15:41AM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
< snip >
> > [...]
> > > +void dump_migrate_failure_pages(struct list_head *page_list)
> > > +{
> > > + DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor,
> > > + "migrate failure");
> > > + if (DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH(descriptor) &&
> > > + alloc_contig_ratelimit()) {
> > > + struct page *page;
> > > +
> > > + WARN(1, "failed callstack");
> > > + list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> > > + dump_page(page, "migration failure");
> > > + }
> >
> > Apart from the above, do we have to warn for something that is a
> > debugging aid? A similar concern wrt dump_page which uses pr_warn and
>
> Make sense.
>
> > page owner is using even pr_alert.
> > Would it make sense to add a loglevel parameter both into __dump_page
> > and dump_page_owner?
>
> Let me try it.
I looked though them and made first draft to clean them up.
It's bigger than my initial expectaion because there are many callsites
to use dump_page and stack_trace_print inconsistent loglevel.
Since it's not a specific problem for this work, I'd like to deal with
it as separate patchset since I don't want to be stuck on here for my
initial goal.
FYI,
Subject: [RFC 0/5] make dump_page aware of loglevel
- Forked from [1]
dump_page uses __dump_page and dump_page_owner internally to
print various information. However, their printk loglevel are
inconsistent in that
__dump_page: KERN_WARNING
__dump_page_owner: KERN_ALERT
stack_trace_print: KERN_DEFAULT
To make them consistent from dump_page, this patch introduces
pr_loglevel in printk and make the utility functions aware of
loglevel. Finally, last patch changes dump_page to support
loglevel to make the printing level consistent.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YEdAw6gnp9XxoWUQ@dhcp22.suse.cz/
Minchan Kim (5):
mm: introduce pr_loglevel for __dump_[page]_owner
stacktrace: stack_trace_print aware of loglevel
mm: page_owner: dump_page_owner aware of loglevel
mm: debug: __dump_page aware of loglevel
mm: debug: dump_page aware of loglevel
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 2 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
include/linux/mmdebug.h | 10 ++++++----
include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
include/linux/printk.h | 12 +++++++++++
include/linux/stacktrace.h | 4 ++--
kernel/backtracetest.c | 2 +-
kernel/dma/debug.c | 3 ++-
kernel/kcsan/report.c | 7 ++++---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ++-
kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 +++--
mm/debug.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/gup_test.c | 4 ++--
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++--
mm/kasan/report.c | 4 ++--
mm/kfence/report.c | 3 ++-
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
mm/page_owner.c | 24 +++++++++++-----------
25 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists