[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210310223510.f0f3bbe50f3c6d21b00ac5a5@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:35:10 +1300
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <jarkko@...nel.org>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<haitao.huang@...el.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/25] x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from
sgx_free_epc_page()
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:39:01 +1300 Kai Huang wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>
> EREMOVE takes a page and removes any association between that page and
> an enclave. It must be run on a page before it can be added into
> another enclave. Currently, EREMOVE is run as part of pages being freed
> into the SGX page allocator. It is not expected to fail.
>
> KVM does not track how guest pages are used, which means that SGX
> virtualization use of EREMOVE might fail.
>
> Break out the EREMOVE call from the SGX page allocator. This will allow
> the SGX virtualization code to use the allocator directly. (SGX/KVM
> will also introduce a more permissive EREMOVE helper).
>
> Implement original sgx_free_epc_page() as sgx_encl_free_epc_page() to be
> more specific that it is used to free EPC page assigned to one enclave.
> Print an error message when EREMOVE fails to explicitly call out EPC
> page is leaked, and requires machine reboot to get leaked pages back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Co-developed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
>
> - Merge original WARN() and pr_err_once() into one single WARN(), suggested
> by Sean.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 12 ++++--------
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> index 7449ef33f081..dcbcf840c522 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,27 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct sgx_vm_ops = {
> .access = sgx_vma_access,
> };
>
> +static void sgx_encl_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(epc_page->flags & SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED);
> +
> + /*
> + * Give a message to remind EPC page is leaked when EREMOVE fails,
> + * and requires machine reboot to get leaked pages back. This can
> + * be improved in future by adding stats of leaked pages, etc.
> + */
> +#define EREMOVE_ERROR_MESSAGE \
> + "EREMOVE returned %d (0x%x). EPC page leaked. Reboot required to retrieve leaked pages."
> + ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(epc_page));
> + if (WARN_ONCE(ret, EREMOVE_ERROR_MESSAGE, ret, ret))
> + return;
> +#undef EREMOVE_ERROR_MESSAGE
> +
> + sgx_free_epc_page(epc_page);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * sgx_encl_release - Destroy an enclave instance
> * @kref: address of a kref inside &sgx_encl
> @@ -404,7 +425,7 @@ void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref)
> if (sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable(entry->epc_page))
> continue;
>
> - sgx_free_epc_page(entry->epc_page);
> + sgx_encl_free_epc_page(entry->epc_page);
> encl->secs_child_cnt--;
> entry->epc_page = NULL;
> }
> @@ -415,7 +436,7 @@ void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref)
> xa_destroy(&encl->page_array);
>
> if (!encl->secs_child_cnt && encl->secs.epc_page) {
> - sgx_free_epc_page(encl->secs.epc_page);
> + sgx_encl_free_epc_page(entry->epc_page);
Sorry. A mistake during copy/paste. Will fix.
> encl->secs.epc_page = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -423,7 +444,7 @@ void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref)
> va_page = list_first_entry(&encl->va_pages, struct sgx_va_page,
> list);
> list_del(&va_page->list);
> - sgx_free_epc_page(va_page->epc_page);
> + sgx_encl_free_epc_page(entry->epc_page);
Sorry. A mistake during copy/paste. Will fix.
> kfree(va_page);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> index 8df81a3ed945..44fe91a5bfb3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> @@ -598,18 +598,14 @@ struct sgx_epc_page *sgx_alloc_epc_page(void *owner, bool reclaim)
> * sgx_free_epc_page() - Free an EPC page
> * @page: an EPC page
> *
> - * Call EREMOVE for an EPC page and insert it back to the list of free pages.
> + * Put the EPC page back to the list of free pages. It's the caller's
> + * responsibility to make sure that the page is in uninitialized state. In other
> + * words, do EREMOVE, EWB or whatever operation is necessary before calling
> + * this function.
> */
> void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page)
> {
> struct sgx_epc_section *section = &sgx_epc_sections[page->section];
> - int ret;
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(page->flags & SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED);
> -
> - ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(page));
> - if (WARN_ONCE(ret, "EREMOVE returned %d (0x%x)", ret, ret))
> - return;
>
> spin_lock(§ion->lock);
> list_add_tail(&page->list, §ion->page_list);
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists