linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] mfd: Add ROHM BD71815 ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210310111755.GN701493@dell>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:17:55 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] mfd: Add ROHM BD71815 ID

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:

> Hello Lee,
> 
> On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 10:36 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Mar 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > 
> > > Add chip ID for ROHM BD71815 and PMIC so that drivers can identify
> > > this IC.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > index 66f673c35303..e5392bcbc098 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ enum rohm_chip_type {
> > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828,
> > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9571,
> > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9574,
> > > +	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815,
> > 
> > Is there a technical reason why these can't be re-ordered?
> 
> No, I don't think so.
> 
> BTW. there will probably be a (trivial) conflict here as both this
> series and the BD9576/BD9573 series add an ID here. Let me guess, you'd

That's fine.  I will resolve that manually.

> like to see them sorted?

Wouldn't that be nice? :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog