[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKOfQ8v=Adp_3k64-WW-YXan_1kCG9mab6rE62VkSwmhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:32:28 -0700
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Add a property to declare secure
regions in Qcom NANDc
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:31 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:36:57PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 05:32:58PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > On a typical end product, a vendor may choose to secure some regions in
> > > the NAND memory which are supposed to stay intact between FW upgrades.
> > > The access to those regions will be blocked by a secure element like
> > > Trustzone. So the normal world software like Linux kernel should not
> > > touch these regions (including reading).
> > >
> > > So let's add a property for declaring such secure regions so that the
> > > driver can skip touching them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom,nandc.yaml | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom,nandc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom,nandc.yaml
> > > index 84ad7ff30121..7500e20da9c1 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom,nandc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom,nandc.yaml
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ patternProperties:
> > > enum:
> > > - 512
> > >
> > > + qcom,secure-regions:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> >
> > Don't you need 64-bit regions potentially? Though 4GB should be enough
> > for anyone.
> >
>
> Yes, given the size of current NAND based systems around, I thought 32 bit is
> enough.
Huh!? I was joking. 4GB is small nowadays. Make this 64-bit.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists