| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA+hA=QzJrkUB1b2EyYAaej6TKucbH1p9R6bi=HUMvhAv-78=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:02:27 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:09 AM Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 21. 3. 9. 오후 9:58, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > devfreq_simple_ondemand_data only needs to be initialized once when
> > calling devm_devfreq_add_device. It's unnecessary to put the data
> > check logic in the hot path (.get_target_freq()) where it will be
> > called all the time during polling. Instead, we only check and initialize
> > it one time during DEVFREQ_GOV_START.
> >
> > This also helps check data validability in advance during DEVFREQ_GOV_START
> > rather than checking it later when running .get_target_freq().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c | 50 +++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c
> > index ea287b57cbf3..341eb7e9dc04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c
> > @@ -15,15 +15,19 @@
> > /* Default constants for DevFreq-Simple-Ondemand (DFSO) */
> > #define DFSO_UPTHRESHOLD (90)
> > #define DFSO_DOWNDIFFERENCTIAL (5)
> > +
> > +static struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data od_default = {
> > + .upthreshold = DFSO_UPTHRESHOLD,
> > + .downdifferential = DFSO_DOWNDIFFERENCTIAL,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_func(struct devfreq *df,
> > unsigned long *freq)
> > {
> > int err;
> > struct devfreq_dev_status *stat;
> > unsigned long long a, b;
> > - unsigned int dfso_upthreshold = DFSO_UPTHRESHOLD;
> > - unsigned int dfso_downdifferential = DFSO_DOWNDIFFERENCTIAL;
> > - struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *data = df->data;
> > + struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *od = df->data;
> >
> > err = devfreq_update_stats(df);
> > if (err)
> > @@ -31,16 +35,6 @@ static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_func(struct devfreq *df,
> >
> > stat = &df->last_status;
> >
> > - if (data) {
> > - if (data->upthreshold)
> > - dfso_upthreshold = data->upthreshold;
> > - if (data->downdifferential)
> > - dfso_downdifferential = data->downdifferential;
> > - }
> > - if (dfso_upthreshold > 100 ||
> > - dfso_upthreshold < dfso_downdifferential)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > /* Assume MAX if it is going to be divided by zero */
> > if (stat->total_time == 0) {
> > *freq = DEVFREQ_MAX_FREQ;
> > @@ -55,7 +49,7 @@ static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_func(struct devfreq *df,
> >
> > /* Set MAX if it's busy enough */
> > if (stat->busy_time * 100 >
> > - stat->total_time * dfso_upthreshold) {
> > + stat->total_time * od->upthreshold) {
> > *freq = DEVFREQ_MAX_FREQ;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -68,7 +62,7 @@ static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_func(struct devfreq *df,
> >
> > /* Keep the current frequency */
> > if (stat->busy_time * 100 >
> > - stat->total_time * (dfso_upthreshold - dfso_downdifferential)) {
> > + stat->total_time * (od->upthreshold - od->downdifferential)) {
> > *freq = stat->current_frequency;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -78,17 +72,41 @@ static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_func(struct devfreq *df,
> > a *= stat->current_frequency;
> > b = div_u64(a, stat->total_time);
> > b *= 100;
> > - b = div_u64(b, (dfso_upthreshold - dfso_downdifferential / 2));
> > + b = div_u64(b, (od->upthreshold - od->downdifferential / 2));
> > *freq = (unsigned long) b;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_check_od(struct devfreq *devfreq)
> > +{
> > + struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *od = devfreq->data;
> > +
> > + if (od) {
> > + if (!od->upthreshold)
> > + od->upthreshold = DFSO_UPTHRESHOLD;
> > +
> > + if (!od->downdifferential)
> > + od->downdifferential = DFSO_DOWNDIFFERENCTIAL;
> > +
> > + if (od->upthreshold > 100 ||
> > + od->upthreshold < od->downdifferential)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + } else {
> > + od = &od_default;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> > unsigned int event, void *data)
> > {
> > switch (event) {
> > case DEVFREQ_GOV_START:
> > + if (devfreq_simple_ondemand_check_od(devfreq))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > return devfreq_monitor_start(devfreq);
> >
> > case DEVFREQ_GOV_STOP:
> >
>
> I'm editing the upthreshold and downdifferential for exposing them
> via sysfs. So that after my work to expose them via sysfs,
> send the patches if you think that need to do more about them.
Thanks for letting me know..
I can rework after your patch merged.
Regards
Aisheng
>
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing&id=dc9e557845c17cee173a6adcc3ae14940da03f44
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Samsung Electronics
> Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists