lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:10:27 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        cj.chengjian@...wei.com, judy.chenhui@...wei.com,
        zhangjinhao2@...wei.com, nixiaoming@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 3/3] futex: fix dead code in attach_to_pi_owner()

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:28:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:14:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Mar 2021, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:06:05AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> > > > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > > > 
> > > > > The handle_exit_race() function is defined in commit 9c3f39860367
> > > > >  ("futex: Cure exit race"), which never returns -EBUSY. This results
> > > > > in a small piece of dead code in the attach_to_pi_owner() function:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); /* Never return -EBUSY */
> > > > > 	...
> > > > > 	if (ret == -EBUSY)
> > > > > 		*exiting = p; /* dead code */
> > > > > 
> > > > > The return value -EBUSY is added to handle_exit_race() in upsteam
> > > > > commit ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when
> > > > > owner is exiting"). This commit was incorporated into v4.9.255, before
> > > > > the function handle_exit_race() was introduced, whitout Modify
> > > > > handle_exit_race().
> > > > > 
> > > > > To fix dead code, extract the change of handle_exit_race() from
> > > > > commit ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when owner
> > > > >  is exiting"), re-incorporated.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Lee writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > This commit takes the remaining functional snippet of:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is exiting")
> > > > > 
> > > > > ... and is the correct fix for this issue.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 9c3f39860367 ("futex: Cure exit race")
> > > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.9.258
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  kernel/futex.c | 6 +++---
> > > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > Same here, what is the upstream git id?
> > > 
> > > It doesn't have one as such - it's a part-patch:
> > > 
> > > > > This commit takes the remaining functional snippet of:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is exiting")
> > 
> > That wasn't obvious :(
> 
> This was also my thinking, which is why I replied to the original
> patch in an attempt to clarify what I thought was happening.
> 
> > Is this a backport of another patch in the stable tree somewhere?
> 
> Yes, it looks like it.
> 
> The full patch was back-ported to v4.14 as:
> 
>   e6e00df182908f34360c3c9f2d13cc719362e9c0

Ok, Zheng, can you put this information in the patch and resend the
whole series?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ