linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210310142643.GQ3479805@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:26:43 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>
Cc:     Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>,
        Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jack@...e.cz,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:21:59AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> On 13:02 10/03, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:30:41AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Forgive my ignorance, but is there a reason why this isn't wired up to
> > > Btrfs at the same time? It seems weird to me that adding a feature
> > 
> > btrfs doesn't support DAX.  only ext2, ext4, XFS and FUSE have DAX support.
> > 
> > If you think about it, btrfs and DAX are diametrically opposite things.
> > DAX is about giving raw access to the hardware.  btrfs is about offering
> > extra value (RAID, checksums, ...), none of which can be done if the
> > filesystem isn't in the read/write path.
> > 
> > That's why there's no DAX support in btrfs.  If you want DAX, you have
> > to give up all the features you like in btrfs.  So you may as well use
> > a different filesystem.
> 
> DAX on btrfs has been attempted[1]. Of course, we could not

But why?  A completeness fetish?  I don't understand why you decided
to do this work.

> have checksums or multi-device with it. However, got stuck on
> associating a shared extent on the same page mapping: basically the
> TODO above dax_associate_entry().
> 
> Shiyang has proposed a way to disassociate existing mapping, but I
> don't think that is the best solution. DAX for CoW will not work until
> we have a way of mapping a page to multiple inodes (page->mapping),
> which will convert a 1-N inode-page mapping to M-N inode-page mapping.

If you're still thinking in terms of pages, you're doing DAX wrong.
DAX should work without a struct page.