lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ZPO7D1hGHZvuBQ52Vy2W7UUSW+YFE-Ax6-NMDnmrKTBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:56:46 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     maz@...nel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64 syzbot instances

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 1:33 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:38:21PM +0100, 'Dmitry Vyukov' via syzkaller wrote:
> > Hi arm64 maintainers,
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > We now have some syzbot instances testing arm64 (woohoo!) using qemu
> > emulation. I wanted to write up the current status.
>
> Nice!
>
> > There are 3 instances, first uses KASAN:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream?manager=ci-qemu2-arm64
> > second KASAN and 32-bit userspace test load (compat):
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream?manager=ci-qemu2-arm64-compat
> > third uses MTE/KASAN_HWTAGS:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream?manager=ci-qemu2-arm64-mte
> >
> > Kernel configs:
> > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/upstream-arm64-kasan.config
> > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/upstream-arm64-mte.config
>
> FWIW, I keep my fuzzing config fragment in my fuzzing/* branches on
> git.kernel.org, and for comparison my fragment for v5.12-rc1 is:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/commit/?h=fuzzing/5.12-rc1&id=6d9f7f8a2514fe882823fadbe7478228f71d7ab1
>
> ... I'm not sure whether there's anything in that which is novel to you.

Hi Mark,

I've learned about DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING which we had disabled. I am enabling it.
We also have CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE disabled. I don't completely
understand what it's doing. Is it also "more debug checks" type of
config?

FWIW we have more debug configs:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/bits/debug.yml
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/bits/base.yml
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/bits/kasan.yml
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/dashboard/config/linux/bits/kmemleak.yml

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ