[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311165842.GA5031@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:28:42 +0530
From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 02/16] net: phy: Introduce
fwnode_mdio_find_device()
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:50:57PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:21 PM Calvin Johnson
> <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Define fwnode_mdio_find_device() to get a pointer to the
> > mdio_device from fwnode passed to the function.
> >
> > Refactor of_mdio_find_device() to use fwnode_mdio_find_device().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v7:
> > - correct fwnode_mdio_find_device() description
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - fix warning for function parameter of fwnode_mdio_find_device()
> >
> > Changes in v5: None
> > Changes in v4: None
> > Changes in v3: None
> > Changes in v2: None
> >
> > drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c | 11 +----------
> > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/phy.h | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c b/drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c
> > index ea9d5855fb52..d5e0970b2561 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/of_mdio.c
> > @@ -347,16 +347,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register);
> > */
> > struct mdio_device *of_mdio_find_device(struct device_node *np)
> > {
> > - struct device *d;
> > -
> > - if (!np)
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - d = bus_find_device_by_of_node(&mdio_bus_type, np);
> > - if (!d)
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - return to_mdio_device(d);
> > + return fwnode_mdio_find_device(of_fwnode_handle(np));
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdio_find_device);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > index cc38e326405a..daabb17bba00 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > @@ -2819,6 +2819,29 @@ static bool phy_drv_supports_irq(struct phy_driver *phydrv)
> > return phydrv->config_intr && phydrv->handle_interrupt;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * fwnode_mdio_find_device - Given a fwnode, find the mdio_device
> > + * @fwnode: pointer to the mdio_device's fwnode
> > + *
> > + * If successful, returns a pointer to the mdio_device with the embedded
> > + * struct device refcount incremented by one, or NULL on failure.
> > + * The caller should call put_device() on the mdio_device after its use.
> > + */
> > +struct mdio_device *fwnode_mdio_find_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + struct device *d;
> > +
> > + if (!fwnode)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + d = bus_find_device_by_fwnode(&mdio_bus_type, fwnode);
>
> Sorry about the late review, but can you look into using
> get_dev_from_fwnode()? As long as you aren't registering two devices
> for the same fwnode, it's an O(1) operation instead of having to loop
> through a list of devices in a bus. You can check the returned
> device's bus type if you aren't sure about not registering two devices
> with the same fw_node and then fall back to this looping.
I think it is better to keep it simple and clear with
bus_find_device_by_fwnode() instead of the additional code that comes
with get_dev_from_fwnode() until it has clear advantage over the former.
regards
Calvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists