[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210311190845.9708-2-shy828301@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:08:33 -0800
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: guro@...com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
shakeelb@...gle.com, david@...morbit.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: shy828301@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [v10 PATCH 01/13] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint
The tracepoint's nid should show what node the shrink happens on, the start tracepoint
uses nid from shrinkctl, but the nid might be set to 0 before end tracepoint if the
shrinker is not NUMA aware, so the tracing log may show the shrink happens on one
node but end up on the other node. It seems confusing. And the following patch
will remove using nid directly in do_shrink_slab(), this patch also helps cleanup
the code.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 407051ebe869..bdc32c803c66 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
else
new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
- trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
+ trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
return freed;
}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists