linux-kernel - [v10 PATCH 07/13] mm: vmscan: add shrinker_info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210311190845.9708-8-shy828301@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:08:39 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     guro@...com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, david@...morbit.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     shy828301@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [v10 PATCH 07/13] mm: vmscan: add shrinker_info_protected() helper

The shrinker_info is dereferenced in a couple of places via rcu_dereference_protected
with different calling conventions, for example, using mem_cgroup_nodeinfo helper
or dereferencing memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info.  And the later patch
will add more dereference places.

So extract the dereference into a helper to make the code more readable.  No
functional change.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7fdfdacf9a1f..ef9f1531a6ee 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ static inline int shrinker_map_size(int nr_items)
 	return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
 }
 
+static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+						     int nid)
+{
+	return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
+					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
+}
+
 static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				    int size, int old_size)
 {
@@ -201,7 +208,7 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
-		old = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
+		old = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 		/* Not yet online memcg */
 		if (!old)
 			return 0;
@@ -232,7 +239,7 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
-		info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
+		info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 		kvfree(info);
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
 	}
@@ -675,8 +682,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
 		return 0;
 
-	info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
-					 true);
+	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 	if (unlikely(!info))
 		goto unlock;
 
-- 
2.26.2