[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b76a5239650842f7bd852b6b4dba3288@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:13:02 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Jin, Wen" <wen.jin@...el.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] PCI/RCEC: Fix RCiEP capable devices RCEC
association
> [...]
>
> I think 507b460f8144 appeared in v5.11, so not something we broke in v5.12.
> Applied to pci/error for v5.13, thanks!
Thanks Bjorn!
> If I understand correctly, we previously only got this right in one
> case:
>
> 0 == PCI_SLOT(00.0) # correct
> 1 == PCI_SLOT(00.1) # incorrect
> 2 == PCI_SLOT(00.2) # incorrect
> ...
> 8 == PCI_SLOT(01.0) # incorrect
> 9 == PCI_SLOT(01.1) # incorrect
> ...
> 31 == PCI_SLOT(03.7) # incorrect
Yes, you're right.
Thanks!
-Qiuxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists