[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311215914.pgpz2yymmfqlainl@episode>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:01:09 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Rob H <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no
#address-cells for interrupt-controller
Andre, Rob,
On 16:38-20210126, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Now that I look back at the dtc change, I'm now confused why this
> > check got applied. Both David and I wanted changes in regards to
> > #address-cells. Either a separate check or part of interrupt-map checks.
> > And the interrupt-map check never got applied. Andre?
>
> Yeah, I somewhat dropped the ball on this, after some iterations and a
> partial merge. Will put it on my list to revive this.
I was hoping we made some steps, but I did see [1] as well and it is
possible that I am missing some discussion, but it is starting to get
W=2 builds warnings noisy enough to start interfering with discovering
real problems as we keep adding new stuff in.. Just wondering...
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq++DyiKG9smQGx9FAPDJnVrezcXNb0Y5uh-5_2GBzTQpQ@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ns6hPCBxVM/
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists