[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311083530.GA7263@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:35:30 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm: remove the drm file system
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:32:34PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:43PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Just use the generic anon_inode file system.
>
> Are you changing the lifetime rules for that module?
The core drm module is pinned by the actual drivers that use the
library functions, so no.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists