[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ff5f190c66159773c67a1b4fc73e00751fb9c28.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:12:31 +0000
From: Mirela Rabulea <mirela.rabulea@....com>
To: "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl" <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@....com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com" <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se"
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com" <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>,
"ezequiel@...labora.com" <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] media: imx-jpeg: Add V4L2 driver for
i.MX8 JPEG Encoder/Decoder
On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 08:27 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> Hi Mirela,
>
> On 11/03/2021 01:28, Mirela Rabulea (OSS) wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > +static const struct of_device_id mxc_jpeg_match[] = {
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "nxp,imx8qxp-jpgdec",
> > + .data = (void *)MXC_JPEG_DECODE,
>
> Don't do this, just say:
>
> static const int mxc_decode_mode = MXC_JPEG_DECODE;
> static const int mxc_encode_mode = MXC_JPEG_ENCODE;
>
> and point to that:
>
> .data = &mxc_decode_mode;
>
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "nxp,imx8qxp-jpgenc",
> > + .data = (void *)MXC_JPEG_ENCODE,
>
> .data = &mxc_encode_mode;
>
> > + },
> > + { },
> > +};
>
> <snip>
>
> > +static int mxc_jpeg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct mxc_jpeg_dev *jpeg;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int dec_irq;
> > + int ret;
> > + int mode;
> > + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> > + unsigned int slot;
> > +
> > + of_id = of_match_node(mxc_jpeg_match, dev->of_node);
> > + mode = (int)(u64)of_id->data;
>
> and this becomes:
>
> mode = *(const int *)of_id->data;
>
> This will solve the kernel test robot warning, and for that matter
> the same gcc warnings I get when I compile.
Hi Hans,
thanks for the suggestion, I missed that warning among the verbosity
from the other ones. Perhaps for the future it would be usefull for me
to try and replicate the kernel test robot environment.
I sent v9.1 just for this patch.
Regards,
Mirela
>
> Just post a v9.1 for this patch, everything else looks good.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists