linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] infiniband/core: Fix a use after free in cm_work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YEn5XxgB1LqQ0PSE@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:05:03 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn
Cc:     dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] infiniband/core: Fix a use after free in
 cm_work_handler

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:29:19PM +0800, lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn wrote:
> In the implementation of destory_cm_id(), it restores cm_id_priv by
> "cm_id_priv = container_of(cm_id, struct iwcm_id_private, id);".
>
> And the last line of destory_cm_id() calls "(void)iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);"
> to free the cm_id_priv.

It is not enough to see double call to iwcm_deref_id() because it is
protected with refcount to claim use-after-free. Did you hit the BUG_ON()
for the second call to iwcm_deref_id()?

And please don't do top-posting.

Thanks

>
>
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@...nel.org>
> > 发送时间: 2021-03-11 17:22:03 (星期四)
> > 收件人: "Lv Yunlong" <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
> > 抄送: dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] infiniband/core: Fix a use after free in cm_work_handler
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:21:53PM -0800, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> > > In cm_work_handler, it calls destory_cm_id() to release
> > > the initial reference of cm_id_priv taken by iw_create_cm_id()
> > > and free the cm_id_priv. After destory_cm_id(), iwcm_deref_id
> > > (cm_id_priv) will be called and cause a use after free.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 59c68ac31e15a ("iw_cm: free cm_id resources on the last deref")
> > > Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
> > > index da8adadf4755..cb6b4ac45e21 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
> > > @@ -1035,8 +1035,10 @@ static void cm_work_handler(struct work_struct *_work)
> > >
> > >  		if (!test_bit(IWCM_F_DROP_EVENTS, &cm_id_priv->flags)) {
> > >  			ret = process_event(cm_id_priv, &levent);
> > > -			if (ret)
> > > +			if (ret) {
> > >  				destroy_cm_id(&cm_id_priv->id);
> > > +				return;
> >
> > The destroy_cm_id() is called to free ->id and not cm_id_priv. This "return"
> > leaks cm_id_priv now and what "a use after free" do you see?
> >
> > > +			}
> > >  		} else
> > >  			pr_debug("dropping event %d\n", levent.event);
> > >  		if (iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv))
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >