[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210311004904.121205-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:49:04 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support),
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support)
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8173: rename local irq variable
cppcheck warning:
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c:929:28: style: Local
variable 'irq' shadows outer argument [shadowArgument]
struct mtk_base_afe_irq *irq;
^
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c:914:47: note: Shadowed
declaration
static irqreturn_t mt8173_afe_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
^
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c:929:28: note: Shadow
variable
struct mtk_base_afe_irq *irq;
^
Not a great idea to have two 'irq' variables in the same function...
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 685f4074b4e0..6350390414d4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -926,14 +926,14 @@ static irqreturn_t mt8173_afe_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
for (i = 0; i < MT8173_AFE_MEMIF_NUM; i++) {
struct mtk_base_afe_memif *memif = &afe->memif[i];
- struct mtk_base_afe_irq *irq;
+ struct mtk_base_afe_irq *irq_p;
if (memif->irq_usage < 0)
continue;
- irq = &afe->irqs[memif->irq_usage];
+ irq_p = &afe->irqs[memif->irq_usage];
- if (!(reg_value & (1 << irq->irq_data->irq_clr_shift)))
+ if (!(reg_value & (1 << irq_p->irq_data->irq_clr_shift)))
continue;
snd_pcm_period_elapsed(memif->substream);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists