[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508f875f-6fed-9bfc-5f3e-297e4c21ec29@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:29:14 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: qcom: add static port map support
On 09/03/2021 16:10, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
>> list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
>> @@ -473,8 +475,13 @@ static int qcom_swrm_compute_params(struct
>> sdw_bus *bus)
>> }
>> list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
>> + slave = s_rt->slave;
>> list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> - pcfg = &ctrl->pconfig[i];
>> + m_port = slave->m_port_map[_rtp->num - 1];
>> + if (m_port)
>> + pcfg = &ctrl->pconfig[m_port - 1];
>> + else
>> + pcfg = &ctrl->pconfig[i];
>
> Maybe add a short comment on port allocation, I had to think a bit to
> figure out why the -1 was required on both peripheral and manager but it
> is not below [1]
I agree, will add some comment here to explain the offsets correctly!
--srini
>
>> p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
>> p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
>> pcfg->si + 1;
>> @@ -535,8 +542,10 @@ static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct
>> qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
>> struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
>> struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
>> + struct sdw_slave *slave;
>> unsigned long *port_mask;
>> int i, maxport, pn, nports = 0, ret = 0;
>> + unsigned int m_port;
>> mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
>> @@ -549,9 +558,15 @@ static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct
>> qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> }
>> list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
>> + slave = s_rt->slave;
>> list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
>> + m_port = slave->m_port_map[p_rt->num - 1];
>> /* Port numbers start from 1 - 14*/
>> - pn = find_first_zero_bit(port_mask, maxport);
>> + if (m_port)
>> + pn = m_port;
>> + else
>> + pn = find_first_zero_bit(port_mask, maxport);
>
> [1]
>
>> +
>> if (pn > (maxport)) {
>> dev_err(ctrl->dev, "All ports busy\n");
>> ret = -EBUSY;
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists