lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08de868e-d207-8980-1da4-da79eda07560@auristor.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:54:47 -0500
From:   Jeffrey E Altman <jaltman@...istor.com>
To:     "David Howells (dhowells@...hat.com)" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@...h.uni-hamburg.de>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] AFS metadata xattr fixes

On 3/11/2021 9:10 AM, David Howells (dhowells@...hat.com) wrote:
> I wonder if it's better to just hide all the afs.* xattrs from listxattr().
> It would probably be even better to not use xattrs for this, but I'm not
> sure what I would use instead.

I believe that all of the "afs.*" xattrs should be hidden from 
listxattr().  Any "afs.*" xattr that is read from an afs inode can be 
copied to another filesystem and stored.  Attempts to set these values 
in an afs volume will fail.

The use of xattrs is intended to be an alternative to the IBM/OpenAFS 
pioctls which are accessed by processes such as "fs", "aklog", "tokens", 
etc which would know the names of the xattrs and how to use them.   Such 
tools would not require listxattr() to find them.

Thanks for the consideration.

Jeffrey Altman



View attachment "jaltman.vcf" of type "text/x-vcard" (272 bytes)

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4033 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ