[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311150820.GA15552@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:08:21 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] do_wait: make PIDTYPE_PID case O(1) instead of O(n)
On 03/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org> writes:
>
> > +static int do_wait_pid(struct wait_opts *wo)
> > +{
> > + struct task_struct *target = pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is subtle change in behavior.
>
> Today on the task->children list we only place thread group leaders.
Aaah, yes, thanks Eric!
> So the code either needs a thread_group_leader filter on target before
> the ptrace=0 case or we need to use "pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_TGID)"
> and "pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_PID)" for the "ptrace=1" case.
Agreed,
> I would like to make thread_group_leaders go away
Hmm, why?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists