lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311150820.GA15552@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:08:21 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] do_wait: make PIDTYPE_PID case O(1) instead of O(n)

On 03/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org> writes:
>
> > +static int do_wait_pid(struct wait_opts *wo)
> > +{
> > +	struct task_struct *target = pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is subtle change in behavior.
>
> Today on the task->children list we only place thread group leaders.

Aaah, yes, thanks Eric!

> So the code either needs a thread_group_leader filter on target before
> the ptrace=0 case or we need to use "pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_TGID)"
> and "pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_PID)" for the "ptrace=1" case.

Agreed,

> I would like to make thread_group_leaders go away

Hmm, why?

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ