[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA5qM4CM4noDtaedPpd0yh8R2f+jDV2DnCERKi_ycD5Lq-vKDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:48:32 -0500
From: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@...el.com>,
Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@...el.com>,
qat-linux@...el.com, linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: qat: ADF_STATUS_PF_RUNNING should be set
after adf_dev_init
Hi Andy,
Complete newbie here, could you please remind me of the tag you are
referring to?
I am not really familiar with the process.
Thanks,
- Tong
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:35 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:21 PM Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > ADF_STATUS_PF_RUNNING is (only) used and checked by adf_vf2pf_shutdown()
> > before calling adf_iov_putmsg()->mutex_lock(vf2pf_lock), however the
> > vf2pf_lock is initialized in adf_dev_init(), which can fail and when it
> > fail, the vf2pf_lock is either not initialized or destroyed, a subsequent
> > use of vf2pf_lock will cause issue.
> > To fix this issue, only set this flag if adf_dev_init() returns 0.
> >
> > [ 7.178404] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in __mutex_lock.isra.0+0x1ac/0x7c0
> > [ 7.180345] Call Trace:
> > [ 7.182576] mutex_lock+0xc9/0xd0
> > [ 7.183257] adf_iov_putmsg+0x118/0x1a0 [intel_qat]
> > [ 7.183541] adf_vf2pf_shutdown+0x4d/0x7b [intel_qat]
> > [ 7.183834] adf_dev_shutdown+0x172/0x2b0 [intel_qat]
> > [ 7.184127] adf_probe+0x5e9/0x600 [qat_dh895xccvf]
>
> Don't you miss the tag I gave?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists