linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: qat: ADF_STATUS_PF_RUNNING should be set after adf_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA5qM4DPqtPWMydx41Ovx6DCQoEESewkZbQrbhdwfVhkcy0nCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:10:37 -0500
From:   Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@...el.com>,
        Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@...el.com>,
        qat-linux@...el.com, linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: qat: ADF_STATUS_PF_RUNNING should be set
 after adf_dev_init

Hi Andy,
I am not really sure this reviewed by line should be added by me --
IMHO from my past experience this line is added by the actual person
who reviewed it on a per-patch and version basis
I can send out another revision adding this Reviewed-by line if you
think this is something should be done by me,
but I don't feel I have such power to do this since I am not that guy
and I am not a maintainer.
Thanks,
- Tong