linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 6/7] clk: tegra: Don't allow zero clock rate for PLLs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210312163632.8861-7-digetx@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:36:31 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/7] clk: tegra: Don't allow zero clock rate for PLLs

Zero clock rate doesn't make sense for PLLs and tegra-clk driver enters
into infinite loop on trying to calculate PLL parameters for zero rate.
Make code to error out if requested rate is zero.

Originally this trouble was found by Robert Yang while he was trying to
bring up upstream kernel on Samsung Galaxy Tab, which happened due to a
bug in Tegra DRM driver that erroneously sets PLL rate to zero. This
issues came over again recently during of kernel bring up on ASUS TF700T.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
---
 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
index d709ecb7d8d7..af7d4941042e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
@@ -558,6 +558,9 @@ static int _calc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct tegra_clk_pll_freq_table *cfg,
 	u32 p_div = 0;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!rate)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	switch (parent_rate) {
 	case 12000000:
 	case 26000000:
-- 
2.29.2