linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 19/24] x86/resctrl: Make ctrlval arrays the same size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210312175849.8327-20-james.morse@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:58:44 +0000
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
        Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
        D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/24] x86/resctrl: Make ctrlval arrays the same size

The CODE and DATA resources have their own ctrlval arrays which are half
the size because num_closid was already adjusted.

Prior to having one ctrlval array for the resource, move the num_closid
correction into resctrl, so that the ctrlval arrays are all the same
size.

A short-lived quirk of this is that the caches are reset twice, once
for CODE once for DATA.

Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c     | 10 +++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 4db28ce114bd..f1d0d64e5d97 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void rdt_get_cdp_config(int level, int type)
 	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[type].resctrl;
 	struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
 
-	hw_res->num_closid = hw_res_l->num_closid / 2;
+	hw_res->num_closid = hw_res_l->num_closid;
 	r->cache.cbm_len = r_l->cache.cbm_len;
 	r->default_ctrl = r_l->default_ctrl;
 	r->cache.shareable_bits = r_l->cache.shareable_bits;
@@ -549,6 +549,14 @@ static int domain_setup_ctrlval(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
 
 	m.low = 0;
 	m.high = hw_res->num_closid;
+
+	/*
+	 * temporary: the array is full-size, but cat_wrmsr() still re-maps
+	 * the index.
+	 */
+	if (hw_res->conf_type != CDP_BOTH)
+		m.high /= 2;
+
 	hw_res->msr_update(d, &m, r);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index 4ef8f90da043..a3e5c8b1b0cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -2154,6 +2154,8 @@ static int schemata_list_create(void)
 		s->res = r;
 		s->conf_type = resctrl_to_arch_res(r)->conf_type;
 		s->num_closid = resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(r);
+		if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid))
+			s->num_closid /= 2;
 
 		ret = snprintf(s->name, sizeof(s->name), r->name);
 		if (ret >= sizeof(s->name)) {
@@ -2366,6 +2368,13 @@ static int reset_all_ctrls(struct rdt_resource *r)
 	msr_param.low = 0;
 	msr_param.high = hw_res->num_closid;
 
+	/*
+	 * temporary: the array is full-sized, but cat_wrmsr() still re-maps
+	 * the index.
+	 */
+	if (hw_res->cdp_enabled)
+		msr_param.high /= 2;
+
 	/*
 	 * Disable resource control for this resource by setting all
 	 * CBMs in all domains to the maximum mask value. Pick one CPU
-- 
2.30.0