lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210312192634.GS7604@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 20:26:34 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fs/btrfs: Convert raid5/6 kmaps to kmap_local_page()

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:48:24PM -0800, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> 
> These kmaps are thread local and don't need to be atomic.  So they can use
> the more efficient kmap_local_page().  However, the mapping of pages in
> the stripes and the additional parity and qstripe pages are a bit
> trickier because the unmapping must occur in the opposite order from the
> mapping.  Furthermore, the pointer array in __raid_recover_end_io() may
> get reordered.
> 
> Convert these calls to kmap_local_page() taking care to reverse the
> unmappings of any page arrays as well as being careful with the mappings
> of any special pages such as the parity and qstripe pages.

Though there's one more allocation for the additional array, I don't see
a simpler way to avoid it and track the array reordering at a lower
memory cost. At least it's not in a performance critical code and the
array size is reasonably small.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ