linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/14] bitsperlong.h: introduce SMALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:12:22 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@...el.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] bitsperlong.h: introduce SMALL_CONST() macro

On 12/03/2021 06.28, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:07:27AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 18/02/2021 05.05, Yury Norov wrote:
>>> Many algorithms become simpler if they are passed with relatively small
>>> input values. One example is bitmap operations when the whole bitmap fits
>>> into one word. To implement such simplifications, linux/bitmap.h declares
>>> small_const_nbits() macro.
>>>
>>> Other subsystems may also benefit from optimizations of this sort, like
>>> find_bit API in the following patches. So it looks helpful to generalize
>>> the macro and extend it's visibility.
>>
>> Perhaps, but SMALL_CONST is too generic a name, it needs to keep "bits"
>> somewhere in there. So why not just keep it at small_const_nbits?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h |  2 ++
>>>  include/linux/bitmap.h            | 33 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
>>> index 3905c1c93dc2..0eeb77544f1d 100644
>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
>>> @@ -23,4 +23,6 @@
>>>  #define BITS_PER_LONG_LONG 64
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>> +#define SMALL_CONST(n) (__builtin_constant_p(n) && (unsigned long)(n) < BITS_PER_LONG)
>>> +
>>>  #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_BITS_PER_LONG */
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/bitmap.h b/include/linux/bitmap.h
>>> index adf7bd9f0467..e89f1dace846 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/bitmap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/bitmap.h
>>> @@ -224,9 +224,6 @@ extern int bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf,
>>>   * so make such users (should any ever turn up) call the out-of-line
>>>   * versions.
>>>   */
>>> -#define small_const_nbits(nbits) \
>>> -	(__builtin_constant_p(nbits) && (nbits) <= BITS_PER_LONG && (nbits) > 0)
>>> -
>>>  static inline void bitmap_zero(unsigned long *dst, unsigned int nbits)
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned int len = BITS_TO_LONGS(nbits) * sizeof(unsigned long);
>>> @@ -278,7 +275,7 @@ extern void bitmap_to_arr32(u32 *buf, const unsigned long *bitmap,
>>>  static inline int bitmap_and(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1,
>>>  			const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits)
>>>  {
>>> -	if (small_const_nbits(nbits))
>>> +	if (SMALL_CONST(nbits - 1))
>>
>> Please don't force most users to be changed to something less readable.
>> What's wrong with just keeping small_const_nbits() the way it is,
>> avoiding all this churn and keeping the readability?
> 
> The wrong thing is that it's defined in include/linux/bitmap.h, and I
> cannot use it in include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h, so I have to either
> move it to a separate header, or generalize and share with find.h and
> other users this way. I prefer the latter option, thougt it's more
> verbose.

The logical place would be the same place the BITS_PER_LONG macro is
defined, no? No need to introduce a new header for that, and all current
users of small_const_nbits() must already (very possibly indirectly)
include asm-generic/bitsperlong.h.

I do prefer to keep both the name small_const_nbits() and its current
semantics, which, although not currently spelled out that way anywhere,
is "is BITMAP_SIZE(nbits) known at compile time and equal to 1", which
is precisely what allows the static inlines to unconditionally
dereference the pointer (that's the "exclude the 0 case") and just deal
with that one word.

I don't like either SMALL_CONST or small_const_size, because nothing in
there says it has anything to do with bit ops. As I said, if you have
some special place that for some reason cannot handle
nbits==BITS_PER_LONG, then just add that as an additional constraint
with a comment why.

Rasmus