linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/30] scsi: libfc: fc_rport: Fix incorrect naming of fc_rport_adisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210312094738.2207817-6-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:47:13 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/30] scsi: libfc: fc_rport: Fix incorrect naming of fc_rport_adisc_resp()

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:1500: warning: expecting prototype for fc_rport_els_adisc_resp(). Prototype was for fc_rport_adisc_resp() instead

Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index 56003208d2e7c..cd0fb8ca2425d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static void fc_rport_enter_logo(struct fc_rport_priv *rdata)
 }
 
 /**
- * fc_rport_els_adisc_resp() - Handler for Address Discovery (ADISC) responses
+ * fc_rport_adisc_resp() - Handler for Address Discovery (ADISC) responses
  * @sp:	       The sequence the ADISC response was on
  * @fp:	       The ADISC response frame
  * @rdata_arg: The remote port that sent the ADISC response
-- 
2.27.0