[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fc386d78c044d3da723fe38446edb75@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:13:39 +0000
From: "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
CC: "Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] infiniband/i40iw: Fix a use after free in
i40iw_cm_event_handler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband/i40iw: Fix a use after free in
> i40iw_cm_event_handler
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:14:14PM -0800, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> > In the case of I40IW_CM_EVENT_ABORTED, i40iw_event_connect_error()
> > could be called to free the event->cm_node. However, event->cm_node
> > will be used after and cause use after free. It needs to add flags to
> > inform that event->cm_node has been freed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This might be OK (though I don't like the free variable), Shiraz??
>
How was this reproduced? Do you have some call trace leading up to use after free?
The cm_node refcnt is bumped at creation time and once in i40iw_receive_ilq before packet is processed.
That should protect the cm_node from disappearing in the event handler in the abort event case.
The dec at end of i40iw_receive ilq should be point where the cm_node is freed specifically in the abort case.
Shiraz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists