[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452c1619-fcda-d006-721a-d471389aa90a@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:58:18 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, amitk@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal/drivers/cpufreq_cooling: Use device name
instead of auto-numbering
Hi Daniel,
Only minor comments.
On 3/10/21 11:45 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Currently the naming of a cooling device is just a cooling technique
> followed by a number. When there are multiple cooling devices using
> the same technique, it is impossible to clearly identify the related
> device as this one is just a number.
>
> For instance:
>
> thermal-cpufreq-0
> thermal-cpufreq-1
> etc ...
>
> The 'thermal' prefix is redundant with the subsystem namespace. This
> patch removes the 'thermal prefix and changes the number by the device
missing ', after 'thermal
> name. So the naming above becomes:
>
> cpufreq-cpu0
> cpufreq-cpu4
> etc ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
> index 10af3341e5ea..cf0332bbdcd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/energy_model.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
You can now also remove the header:
#include <linux/idr.h>
other than that, LGTM
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists